- #JAMES CAMERON AVATAR THE GAME 1080P MOVIE#
- #JAMES CAMERON AVATAR THE GAME 1080P PLUS#
- #JAMES CAMERON AVATAR THE GAME 1080P SERIES#
#JAMES CAMERON AVATAR THE GAME 1080P SERIES#
Also, how come the wildlife didn't save the Na'vi in the game at the last level over the Tree of Souls? Wouldn't Eywa, being a sentient planetary entity, be aware of the RDA's intent to take control of Pandora through the emulator? So, wouldn't just sending the wildlife off to combat the RDA then and there, BEFORE they overrode Eywa's sentience and took control of Eywa be more practical than just leaving the Na'vi defenders alone to combat the RDA and their technology? The whole series of events in the game seem to cancel out a lot of things that take place in the movie.
#JAMES CAMERON AVATAR THE GAME 1080P MOVIE#
Furthermore, since the last level in the game takes place in the area immediately around the Tree of Souls, same as the area in the last battle in the movie, wouldn't the Na'vi all unite to protect it anyway, seeing as they're very communal and would die to protect Eywa? The outcome of the last battle in the game means that the losing side would be severely depleted of manpower and resources, meaning that a similiar spectacle would be quite difficult to replicate at the same location a mere two years later, which is when the movie takes place. If anyone could give me a link showing that it does take place two years before the movie, it would be greatly appreciated. I haven't even found it in the game's official website, or even in the game's instruction booklet itself. Also, at least to my sources, I haven't found a source yet that specifically says the game takes place exactly two years before the movie. Even if the movie took place a whole two years after these events, I'm definitely sure the Na'vi or the RDA wouldn't sit idly about and just try to coexist with each other during those two years with Avatars and education programs skirmishes and search-and-destroy missions taking place would seem like more logical events that would take place a mere two years after the war is supposedly over. Even learning about their communal culture, concerns about the environment, the extremely intricate details of Pandora's plants and animals, or educating those Na'vi children with English would take an obvious back seat to the one practical concern of winning the damn war and surviving on Pandora. Wouldn't the RDA or the universe's fictional news agencies take notice of such a debacle? And the fact that OPEN WAR breaks out at the beginning of the game would mean that the RDA now has no use of the Avatars because they now know that the AVTR Program is staffed by too many environmentally concerned, Na'vi sympathizing scientists anyway.
#JAMES CAMERON AVATAR THE GAME 1080P PLUS#
Rene Harper, plus a few other LEADING scientists have now openly defected to the Na'vi after the game's intro. For one, if it takes place two years before the movie, wouldn't the big changes that occurred in the game obviously influence the RDA's policy towards Avatars and the Na'vi in general? For example, in the game it shows that the CHIEF LEADER of the AVTR Program, Dr. It seems more like a Retelling because of these chief reasons: Okay, people have been changing the game's "story" article from saying that it's a retelling to being a prequel that takes place 2 years ago. He is stationed at Hell's Gate, Jake wasn't.- Lekgolo 02:15, Decem(UTC) Sorry for the bad grammar and not being very clear, but it's 6 a.m so my mind isn't at its sharpest =P. Quaritch's survival would suggest that the events could be happening before the film.Įven so this is all just theorizing, so if someone knows the facts, please do correct me. Or it could very well just mean that Ubisoft has good ideas =P.Īnd it's even mentioned in the game that its story takes place roughly two years before the story in the movie. Then again, Cameron has said that he might consult Ubisoft for ideas before making the sequel(s), which could favor the opinion that game and film do coexist in the same timeline but in different times of it. Which could mean a retelling, or a prologue depending on the view. All of the interviews that I've seen just say that the game "tells its own story". I know that Ubisoft had almost complete freedom over the game and it could be seen as an alternative story. Mainly because I've been in the assumption that the story in the game happens prior to the events of the film. I was reading the wiki entry and this question started to bug my mind. 11 Defective by Design - Critical ReceptionĪlternate retelling or a prologue (of some kind)?.
1 Alternate retelling or a prologue (of some kind)?.
0 kommentar(er)
